There's a USB condenser microphone that most people don't know about. It sits in the lineup of one of the most respected audio companies in the industry. The company doesn't push it. Retailers don't stock it. Podcasters and streamers walk right past it.
The mic is the Audio-Technica ATR2500x-USB.
I've been reviewing audio gear for eleven years. I've tested over two hundred microphones. The ATR2500x-USB is the one I keep coming back to for recommendations, and the one I have the hardest time getting people to actually consider.
Audio-Technica released this mic quietly in 2019. No launch event. No influencer campaign. The product page on their website has fewer photos than their $49 headphones. Last month, I noticed they moved it to the "legacy products" section, even though it's still in production.
This borders on negligence.
The ATR2500x-USB has a 16mm condenser capsule, USB-C connectivity, and a built-in headphone jack with zero-latency monitoring. The street price is $79. I paid $149 for my first USB mic in 2013, and it had none of these features.
I'm writing this now because of timing. Black Friday just passed, and I spotted the ATR2500x-USB at $59 on Amazon. I've tracked this mic's pricing since 2019. It has never dropped below $69 until this week.
USB condenser microphones have democratized audio recording, but not all options deliver equal value.
The Blue Yeti Problem
The Blue Yeti has been the default USB microphone recommendation for over a decade. It deserves credit for bringing condenser quality to the USB market at a reasonable price point. The four polar patterns give users flexibility. The build quality is solid. The brand recognition means replacement parts and accessories are everywhere.
I recommended the Yeti to probably three hundred people between 2014 and 2020. I stopped in 2021.
⚠️ Room Noise Magnet
The Yeti picks up everything. Keyboard clicks, chair squeaks, the neighbor's dog, the HVAC system two rooms away. The large capsule and high sensitivity expose untreated room problems.
⚠️ Gain Control Issues
The gain knob is too sensitive. The usable range sits between about 15% and 35% for most voices. Below that, nothing. Above that, distortion.
The Yeti picks up everything. Keyboard clicks, chair squeaks, the neighbor's dog, the HVAC system two rooms away. The large capsule and high sensitivity that make it sound "rich" also make it a magnet for room noise. Most home offices and bedrooms are not treated for audio. The Yeti exposes this problem instead of hiding it.
The gain knob on the Yeti is also too sensitive. The usable range sits between about 15% and 35% for most voices. Below that, you get nothing. Above that, you get distortion. I've watched dozens of new podcasters struggle with this for weeks before giving up or buying a different mic.
The current Yeti X sells for $139. The original Yeti is $99. For the same money, or less, there are better options.
Some History
Audio-Technica entered the USB microphone market in 2011 with the AT2020USB. This was a USB version of their AT2020, a $99 XLR condenser that had been an entry-level studio standard since 2004. The USB version added convenience without sacrificing much audio quality.
In 2014, they released the AT2020USB+, which added the headphone monitoring jack. This mic developed a following among voice actors and audiobook narrators. The sound signature worked well for spoken word. It didn't hype the highs or boom the lows. It just captured voice accurately.
The AT2020USB+ had one issue: the mini-USB connector. By 2018, mini-USB was already outdated. Cables failed. Connections came loose during recording sessions. I personally went through four cables in two years.
Audio-Technica's solution came in 2019. The ATR2500x-USB kept the same capsule size and cardioid pattern, switched to USB-C, and dropped the price by $50. They positioned it as a "entry-level" product, below the AT2020USB+ in their lineup.
This positioning made no sense to me then. It makes no sense to me now.
What You Actually Get
I pulled my ATR2500x-USB out of storage last week to compare it against the Yeti, the Rode NT-USB Mini, and the Elgato Wave:1. All four mics recorded the same voice sample in the same room with the same gain-staging approach.
✓ Tighter Pickup Pattern
The ATR2500x-USB has a tighter pickup pattern than the Yeti. It rejected more room noise. Better for untreated recording spaces.
✓ Zero Setup Required
Worked out of the box on Windows, Mac, and iPad Pro. No software required. No drivers. Plug in and start recording.
The ATR2500x-USB has a tighter pickup pattern than the Yeti. It rejected more room noise. The Rode NT-USB Mini matched it for noise rejection but added a brightness to the high frequencies that some voices don't need. The Elgato Wave:1 performed well across the board but costs $99 and requires the Elgato software for full functionality.
The ATR2500x-USB worked out of the box on Windows, Mac, and my iPad Pro. No software required. No drivers. I plugged it in and started recording.
The included tripod stand is cheap. I'll say that directly. It's a folding desk stand that wobbles if you bump the table. Most USB mics in this price range include similar stands, or no stand at all. I bought a $15 boom arm on Amazon in 2020 and have used it since.
The ATR2500x-USB on the cheap stock stand. I stopped using this stand within a week.
The Price Situation
At $79 retail, the ATR2500x-USB costs $20 less than the original Yeti and $60 less than the Yeti X. The Rode NT-USB Mini is $99. The Shure MV7, which I consider the current benchmark for USB podcasting mics, is $249.
At the current sale price of $59, the math gets ridiculous.
I built a recording setup for my nephew last summer. He's sixteen and starting a gaming YouTube channel. I bought him the ATR2500x-USB for $79, a foam windscreen for $8, and a desk boom arm for $15. Total investment: $102.
His audio sounds cleaner than half the podcasts in my feed that use $300+ setups.
My nephew's desk setup. The ATR2500x-USB with a generic boom arm and pop filter.
Some people will argue that $79 is too close to $99, and you should just spend the extra $20 on the Rode or the Yeti. I disagree. The ATR2500x-USB at $79 is competitive with both. At $59, it's not even a comparison.
Who This Mic Is For
✓ Works For
- Podcasters in untreated rooms
- Streamers avoiding software config
- WFH professionals on Zoom calls
- Voiceover beginners
✗ Does Not Work For
- Musicians needing multiple polar patterns
- ASMR creators (ultra-low noise floors)
- Field recording
- Phantom power passthrough needs
The ATR2500x-USB works for podcasters recording in untreated rooms. It works for streamers who don't want to deal with software configuration. It works for work-from-home professionals who need to sound better on Zoom calls. It works for voiceover beginners who can't justify an XLR setup yet.
It does not work for musicians who need multiple polar patterns. It does not work for ASMR creators who need ultra-low noise floors. It does not work for field recording or any situation where you need phantom power passthrough.
For the majority of people buying their first real microphone, the ATR2500x-USB covers the requirements.
My Recommendation
I own eleven USB microphones. The Shure MV7 is my daily driver for client work. The ATR2500x-USB is what I tell people to buy when they ask me what microphone they should get.
The $59 sale price won't last. Amazon's pricing history shows most Black Friday deals on audio gear expire by December 3rd. At $79, it remains my pick for USB condensers under $100.
The $59 sale price won't last. Amazon's pricing history shows most Black Friday deals on audio gear expire by December 3rd. The mic will go back to $79, and $79 is still a reasonable price.
If you're reading this after the sale ends, the ATR2500x-USB at $79 remains my pick for USB condensers under $100. The Rode NT-USB Mini at $99 is worth considering if you want a slimmer form factor. The Shure MV7 at $249 is where I'd point anyone with budget flexibility who wants a microphone that will last five years without feeling like a compromise.
The ATR2500x-USB doesn't get the attention it deserves. Audio-Technica seems content to let it fade into their back catalog. That's their choice. I'll keep recommending it until they discontinue it or something better shows up at this price point.
Neither has happened yet.